
Last year I found myself experimenting more and more with photo-editing software and apps, especially those that transform photographs into drawings, sketches or paintings imitating a wide range of styles and media.
I know there are photography purists who see this kind of heavy editing as gimmicky or even deceptive, and they’re not entirely wrong. But by sticking to apps that still allowed a good degree of user control and creative input, I discovered that some genuinely interesting results were possible. We even liked a couple enough to have them printed, framed and hung at home, including this one of Betty and Dolly who live just round the corner from us and are seen here modelling their blue winter rugs!
I’m never sure what to call such images – photographically-derived digital art, digitally enhanced photographs or digitally manipulated images, or maybe you’re one of the people who would simply describe them as ‘fake art’. Perhaps there is a generally accepted term out there that I have missed. If you know of one please let me know.
Beautiful photo, John. There is a softness to the colors, and Betty and Dolly look fantastic in their winter rugs.
I appreciate all photos and am not up on all the terms and various processing and other software out there. Great share and information. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Suzette
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve come to accept that art is in the eye of the beholder and file it alongside poetry in my brain. (Think Tracey Emin, Andy Warhol, Rap artists, free verse) Incidentally, I love your Winter donkeys!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Peter – yes I certainly agree that art is in the eye of the beholder.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great result! 🫏
✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣❊✣
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Graham ❄️
LikeLiked by 1 person